英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等 - 节目列表

随身英语|为什么字幕很重要?

随身英语|为什么字幕很重要?

英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等

Why subtitles matter 为什么字幕很重要? Over half of American TV viewers now use subtitles whenever they watch TV, according to survey company YouGov. This trend is even more noticeable in viewers under 30. Subtitles have long been used to help people with hearing impairments or to allow people to watch films in a different language, but why has their use become so widespread? 根据调查公司 YouGov 的数据,超过一半的美国电视观众现在每次看电视都会使用字幕。这一趋势在30岁以下的观众中更为明显。长期以来,字幕一直被用来帮助有听力障碍的人,或者让人们观看不同语言的电影,但是为什么它们的使用如此广泛呢? The reasons for this are both technical and social. Advances in digital sound production and microphones mean that actors can be more natural in their vocal performance, while at the same time audio directors are able to make more and more dramatic soundscapes. Combined with the much smaller speakers contained in modern TV sets, this can all make dialogue seem unintelligible. 造成这种情况的原因既有技术方面的,也有社会方面的。数字声音制作和麦克风的进步意味着演员的声音表演可以更加自然,同时音频导演可以制作出越来越戏剧化的声音场景。再加上现代电视机中更小的扬声器,所有这些都会让对话看起来难以理解。 Smartphones may play a role. We are used to subtitled social media videos that can be watched without headphones. Smartphones also allow us to watch film and TV in public places where they are not easily audible. Another social reason could be the increased appetite for programmes in other languages accessible through international streaming services. 智能手机可能起了一定作用。我们习惯了在社交媒体上观看有字幕的视频,甚至无需佩戴耳机。智能手机还允许我们在不易听到声音的公共场所观看电影和电视。另一个社会原因可能是人们对通过国际流媒体服务观看其他语言节目的需求增加了。 While some viewers may consider subtitles to be distracting, or worry about the potential for spoilers, they don't just help with unclear audio. A number of studies have suggested that subtitles could help people to increase their vocabulary and boost their listening skills in languages that they do not currently speak. 虽然一些观众可能会认为字幕会分散注意力,或者担心潜在的剧透,但字幕不仅能帮助解决音频不清晰的问题。许多研究表明,字幕可以帮助人们增加词汇量,提高他们目前不会说的语言的听力技能。 This may be particularly effective when subtitles are in the same language as the audio track of the programme. Same-language subtitles have also been shown to help young children develop their reading skills in their first language, to the point where campaigners have suggested enabling subtitles on all children's programmes by default. 当字幕与节目的音轨使用同一语言时,这可能特别有效。同语字幕也被证明有助于幼儿发展母语阅读技能,以至于相关活动人士建议在所有儿童节目中默认设置字幕。 词汇表 viewers 观众 hearing impairment 听觉障碍 digital sound production 数字声音制作 natural 自然的 vocal performance 声乐表演 audio director 音频导演 dramatic soundscape 戏剧化的声景 dialogue 对话 unintelligible 无法理解的 audible 听得见的,可以听到的 distracting 分散注意力的 spoiler 剧透 unclear 不清楚的 audio track 音轨 same-language subtitles 同语言字幕 enable 使…可能 ✔更多内容见公众号【琐简英语】,回复“1”,可进入【打卡交流群】

2分钟
99+
2年前
经济学人|办公室的闲话

经济学人|办公室的闲话

英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等

Business Bartleby Gossip in the workplace 商业版块 巴托比专栏 职场八卦 Pssst! Want to read something about rumour and innuendo? 那谁,想读点关于流言蜚语的文章吗? Gossip is everywhere. On one estimate, from Megan Robbins and Alexander Karan of University of California, Riverside, people spend 52 minutes a day on average talking about other people. Gossip pervades the work place. You hear it in conversations among colleagues; you know who to go to for the latest round of it. You can tell when gossip is imminent: voices suddenly lower and there may well be some theatrical looking around to check that the target is not in earshot. 八卦无处不在。根据加州大学河滨分校的梅根·罗宾斯和亚历山大·卡兰的估计,人们平均每天花52分钟谈论别人。职场中到处都是八卦。你可以在同事之间的聊天中听到八卦,你知道要听最新鲜的八卦应该去找谁。你可以判断什么时候马上就要开始说八卦:声音突然变小,可能会夸张地环顾四周,确定八卦的对象不能听见。 Sometimes it is offered up explicitly, like a vol-au-vent at a drinks party:"Do you want to hear a bit of gossip?" And yes, you almost certainly do. Managers have grapevines, too. Scholars of gossip (what happens when these people all get together at a conference is a subject for future research) tend to describe it as informal exchanges of evaluative information about people who aren't there. 有时八卦是明确主动地提供给你,就像酒会上的酥皮馅饼小点心:“你想听点八卦吗?”当然想,你几乎肯定会听。经理们也会八卦。研究八卦的学者(这些人在会议上聚在一起会发生什么,这是未来可以研究的主题)倾向于把这种八卦描述为非正式地交换关于不在场的人的评估性信息 Those exchanges can be complimentary as well as critical. By that definition, bosses who do not gossip about employees may not be doing their job properly. Its ubiquity suggests that gossip must have some benefits. It is definitely a lot more entertaining to talk about colleagues, particularly if they've been seen furtively entering a hotel room together, than the latest set of quarterly numbers. 这些交换既可以是批评性的,也可以是赞扬性的。根据这一定义,不八卦员工的老板可能没有好好完成自己的工作。八卦的普遍性表明,八卦肯定有一些好处。谈论同事绝对比谈论最新的季度数据有意思得多,特别是当有人看到同事们偷偷摸摸地一起进入酒店房间的时候。 Evolutionary psychologists also reckon that gossip is helpful in instilling social norms. In their book "The Social Brain", Tracey Camilleri, Samantha Rockey and Robin Dunbar point to the example of hunter-gatherer groups in southern Africa who use gossip to convey criticism of those who fail to share the spoils of successful hunts. 进化心理学家还认为,八卦有助于培养社会规范。在《社交大脑》一书中,特蕾西·卡米莱里、萨曼莎·罗基、罗宾·邓巴引用了非洲南部狩猎采集团体的例子,这些团体通过八卦来传达对那些不分享成功狩猎战利品的人的批评。 Similar behaviour is visible in the workplace. In a recent paper by Terence Dores Cruz of the University of Amsterdam and his co-authors, participants were asked whether they would share gossip about someone who was constantly slacking off and leaving others to do the work. People were more likely to pass that piece of information on to a person who was going to have to work with this good-for-nothing than to one who was not. The knowledge that reputations are partly forged through gossip can act as a deterrent to bad behaviour. But that reputational effect is also one reason to worry about gossip. For sometimes incentives emerge to spread inaccurate information about other people. Another experiment, conducted by Kim Peters and Miguel Fonseca of the University of Exeter, found, among other things, that lies cropped up twice as frequently when gossipers were told they were in competition with each other. A related problem is that people are drawn to negative gossip more than positive gossip. The news that Colin did a great job generating sales leads last month is not going to spread far and wide. But if they are juicy enough, even outright falsehoods will circulate. In 2021 the Ontario Superior Court in Canada awarded hefty damages to an employee at a volunteer fire department who had been fired by the local municipality on the basis of false rumours that she had engaged in inappropriate sexual behaviour with firefighters. If gossip can cause distress to its targets, it can also be bad for the people sharing information. One of the oddities of gossip is that everyone does it and yet it is so often frowned upon. A recent paper by Maria Kakarika of Durham University Business School and her co-authors found that being seen as a gossipmonger is unlikely to help your career. Participants were given a scenario in which someone spread negative personal gossip about a colleague. They were not just disapproving; they also said they would be more likely to give the gossiper lower performance ratings and to recommend bonus reductions. What then should managers make of gossip? Getting rid of it entirely would require a police state, and in any case deprive the organisation of a potentially useful form of self-regulating behaviour. However, managers can dampen demand for it. If there is uncertainty around a big event like lay-offs or the appointment of a new boss, gossip will flourish. If people think they are being treated unfairly, then they will want to vent about it to co-workers. If workers have jobs that bore them rigid, they will alleviate the tedium with chit-chat. One cure for excess gossip is decent management. ✔更多内容见公众号【琐简英语】,回复“1”,可进入【打卡交流群】

4分钟
99+
2年前
六分钟英语|餐桌上的谈话

六分钟英语|餐桌上的谈话

英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等

Hello. This is 6 Minute English from BBC Learning English. I'm Neil. And I'm Beth. In this programme, we'll be discussing the dinner table – but we're not interested in food. We're talking about… talking! A lot can happen around the dinner table – gossip, arguments. You might meet the love of your life on a blind dinner date or find out you're a great storyteller. Neil, when you were younger, did you eat with your family around a dinner table? We did! Eating at the table was an important ritual. It was something we did every day and, quite often, it was the only time we could get together and chat. I think there's something very comforting about eating good food and being with the people you're closest to and now I do the same with my own family. The kids are more likely to open up, talk more easily, about their day or something troubling them while we're eating. Well, the dinner table is a space that families across the world get together at to not only eat, but chat, and is often the only point in the day or week that the whole family gathers together. In this programme, we'll be discussing how people behave at the table, and, of course, we'll be learning some useful new vocabulary as well. But first I have a question for you, Beth. In 2016, a couple from Germany won the world record for the fastest time to set a dinner table. But, how long did it take them? Was it: a) 25 seconds b) 1 minute 5 seconds c) 2 minutes 5 seconds? Surely not 25 seconds! I'll guess 1 minute 5 seconds. OK, Beth, I'll reveal the answer later in the programme. Now, while eating with a group, you might feel that you need to act in a certain way because of the people around you. Philippa Perry, a psychotherapist and author, thinks we should try to be ourselves as much as possible, as she told BBC World Service programme, The Food Chain: In any group we find a role and, if we're only in one group, if we're only ever with our family, we might think, 'oh, I'm the funny one', 'he's the wise one'. We might think that's who we are. And then we go to another group and then we find, 'oh, I'm the wise one'. And I think if you feel like you're assigned a role in your family, I just think take that with a little bit of a pinch of salt. When you spend time with the same group of people, you might start to think of yourself as 'the funny one' or 'the wise one'. When we say 'the … one', we describe a person by using a particular and prominent characteristic they have. If you're very tall, you might be 'the tall one'. However, Philippa says we should take these labels with a pinch of salt – an idiom meaning you shouldn't believe or do everything you are told or that's expected of you. Now, over time, interactions at the dinner table have changed. In the past, children were sometimes seated on a different table to adults or told they should be seen and not heard, an old-fashioned phrase emphasising that children should be quiet and always on their best behaviour. Ambreia Meadows-Fernandez, a writer and founder of Free Black Motherhood, spoke about older generations' reactions to children asking awkward questions at the dinner table to BBC World Service programme, The Food Chain: So, it's a mixed bag. It's overwhelmingly positive, but I also know that it is kind of a bit of culture shock for them to hear my children ask what they ask because our children haven't really been raised with that line of demarcation between the adult table and the kid table. Ambreia says that the older generation's reactions to her children's questions at the table can be a mixed bag. A mixed bag is a situation that can have positive and negative aspects. She also says that it's a culture shock for them – a sense of feeling uncertain because you're in a different environment to usual. OK, Beth. I think it's time I revealed the answer to my question. I asked you what the world record is for the fastest time to set a dinner table. And I said it was 1 minute 5 seconds. And that was… the right answer! That's not very long, is it? OK, let's recap the vocabulary we've learned from this programme, starting with open up – a phrasal verb meaning speak more easily than usual, particularly about worries or problems. If someone is 'the funny one' or 'the wise one', they are labelled by that particular characteristic. To take something with a pinch of salt means you shouldn't believe everything you're told. Children should be seen and not heard is an old-fashioned phrase that means children should be quiet and behave well. A mixed bag means something has both positive and negative aspects. And finally, a culture shock is an uncertain feeling because you're in a new environment. Once again our six minutes are up. Join us again soon for more useful vocabulary, here at 6 Minute English! Goodbye for now! Bye ✔更多内容见公众号【琐简英语】,回复“1”,可进入【打卡交流群】

5分钟
3k+
2年前
经济学人|制造虚假信息变得越来越容易

经济学人|制造虚假信息变得越来越容易

英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等

When it comes to disinformation, "social media took the cost of distribution to zero, and generative AI takes the cost of generation to zero," says Renee DiResta of the Stanford Internet Observatory. Large language models such as GPT-4 make it easy to produce misleading news articles or social-media posts in huge quantities. 斯坦福大学网络观察室的蕾妮·迪雷斯塔(Renee DiResta)表示,当谈到虚假信息时,“社交媒体将传播成本降至零,而生成式人工智能则将生成成本降至零”。GPT-4 等大语言模型很容易生成大量误导性新闻文章或社交媒体帖子。 And AI can produce more than text. Cloning a voice using AI used to require minutes, or even hours, of sample audio. Last year, however, researchers at Microsoft unveiled VALL-E, an AI model that is able to clone a person's voice from just a three-second clip of them speaking, and make it say any given text. 人工智能可以生成的不仅仅是文本。使用人工智能克隆声音过去需要几分钟甚至几小时的样本音频。然而,去年,微软的研究人员推出了VALL-E,这是一种人工智能模型,能够从一个人说话的三秒片段中克隆出他的声音,并让它说出任何给定的文本。 OpenAl, the American company behind GPT-4, has developed a similar tool, Voice Engine, which can convincingly clone any voice from a 15-second clip. It has not yet released it, recognising "serious risks, which are especially top of mind in an election year". GPT-4背后的美国公司OpenAl开发了一款类似的工具Voice Engine,它可以从15秒的音频片段中克隆任何语音,以假乱真。该模型尚未发布,因为OpenAI认识到“其存在严重风险,这在选举年尤其受到关注”。 Similarly, Sora, from OpenAl, can produce surprisingly realistic synthetic videos, in response to text prompts, of up to a minute in length. OpenAI has yet to release Sora to the public, partly on the ground that it could be used to create disinformation. 同样,来自OpenAl的Sora可以根据文本提示词生成逼真的合成视频,长度可达一分钟,令人叹为观止。OpenAI尚未公开发布Sora,部分原因是它可能被用来制造虚假信息。 As well as providing new ways to discredit or misrepresent politicians, AI tools also raise the spectre of personalised disinformation, generated to appeal to small groups (think soccer moms in a specific town). 除了提供抹黑或歪曲政客的新方法外,人工智能工具还引发了对个性化虚假信息的担忧,这些虚假信息是为了吸引小群体而产生的(想想某个城镇的足球妈妈)。 It may even be possible to "microtarget" individuals with disinformation, based on knowledge of their preferences, biases and concerns. Though all of this is worrying, it is worth remembering that not all aspects of the technology are negative. Al, it turns out, can be used for fighting disinformation as well as producing it. AI甚至可以根据个人的偏好、偏见和担忧,用虚假信息“微观定位”个人。所有这些都令人忧心忡忡,但值得记住的是,并非该技术的所有方面都是负面的。事实证明,人工智能可以用来打击虚假信息,也可以用来制造虚假信息。 ✔更多内容见公众号【琐简英语】,回复“1”,可进入【打卡交流群】

2分钟
99+
2年前
BBC Reel|男女大脑有差异吗

BBC Reel|男女大脑有差异吗

英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等

男性和女性的大脑有差异吗? Are male and female brains different?-BBC REEL I think in the 21st century, we have an opportunity to rethink our understanding of the gendered brain. Because neuroscience can tell us much more about what our brains are for and how the world affects our brains. I think the most common myth that I've come across is that neuroscience has proved (in inverted, commas) that there are clear-cut differences between the brains of men and the brains of women. And that just isn't the case. 我认为在 21 世纪,我们有机会重新思考我们对性别化大脑的理解。因为神经科学可以告诉我们更多关于大脑的作用以及世界如何影响我们大脑的信息。我认为我遇到过的最常见的误解是,神经科学已经证明“男性大脑和女性大脑之间有明显的区别”。可事实并非如此。 When I talk about the pink and blue tsunami, it's really a reflection of how our culture codes differences between girls and boys. So that right from the moment a child is born when people arrive with those awful"It's a girl, pink. It's a boy, blue." cards, they are very quickly being introduced to a gendered world. The multitasking versus map-reading dichotomy where women are supposedly very good at doing lots of different things at once, and men are brilliant at map reading in any kind of spatial tasks. 当我谈到“粉色代表女生,蓝色代表男生”的观念时,它确实反映了我们的文化如何对女孩和男孩之间的差异进行编码。因此,从孩子出生的那一刻起,当人们带着那些令人讨厌的“这是女孩,粉色。这是男孩,蓝色。”视角对号入座时,新生儿很快就被引入了一个依照性别分类的世界。“一心多用”和“读图”的二分法,女性被认为非常擅长同时做很多不同的事情,而男性在任何类型的空间任务中都擅长读图。 And yet when we look at the data that we have for that, we'll see that how you measure those skills makes a difference. And if we look at the brain imaging data, we'll find that really there are no clear-cut findings. Have we actually found any differences between the brains of men and the brains of women? The answer is no. 然而,当我们查看这方面的数据时,我们会发现,你如何衡量这些技能对实际情况很有影响。如果我们看一下大脑成像数据,我们会知道并没有明确的发现。我们是否真的发现了男性大脑和女性大脑有什么不同?答案是否定的。 On average, women's brains were 5 ounces lighter than men's and the early scientists got really excited and thought "Oh, that's the explanation for all the gender gaps." But then somebody pointed out two things. First of all, if you just thought it was a size matters issue, then sperm whales and elephants have got bigger brains than men, and they're not renowned for being that much brighter. 平均而言,女性的大脑比男性的大脑轻 5 盎司(约 142 克),早期的科学家们非常兴奋,他们认为,“哦,这样就能解释所有的性别差异了。”但后来有人指出了两点。首先,如果你认为这只是大小的问题,那么抹香鲸和大象的大脑比男人的大脑大,但它们并不以更聪明而闻名。 If you then look at human brains, you'll see that there's a big overlap in the kind of measurements that you get. So you get a distribution of size in men's brains and distribution of size in women's brains but they overlap. So that you get women with big brains and men with small brains. If you assume that every bit as I do that every brain is different from every other brain, what you need to understand is how you arrived at the identity or the feeling that you have of what gender you are. 如果你再观察人类的大脑,你会发现你得到的测量结果有很大的重叠。所以你得到的是男性大脑的大小分布以及女性大脑的大小分布,但它们是重叠的。这样你得出的就是女性有大的大脑而男性有小的大脑。如果你像我一样假设每个人的大脑都不同于其他人的大脑,你需要了解的是,你是如何对自己的性别形成认同或者形成相应的感觉的。 I think one of the problems we have in the 21st century is that what I call gender bombardment, it's much more intense. There's much more in the social media and a whole range of marketing initiatives which make a very clear prescriptive list of what it's like to be male or what it's like to be female. And if somebody looks at that list and thinks "Well, I'm supposedly a male, but none of the above is true of me." Very often people think that there is something wrong with them. 我认为我们在 21 世纪面临的问题之一就是,我称之为“性别轰炸”,它更加激烈。在社交媒体和一系列的营销举措中都有很多说辞,它们好似约定俗成一般,都非常明确地指向了男性应该是什么样子,或者女性应该是什么样子。如果有人看到这些指向性说明,会觉得“其实,我应该是男性,但以上这些都不符合我。”而通常人们会认为这是他们自己有问题。 My claim is actually we should be looking at the list a lot more carefully and saying that perhaps what we've assumed was a very clear distinction between males and females is nothing like as clear as has been claimed. So an understanding that every brain is different from every other brain and not necessarily just a function or the sex of the brain's owners is a really important step forward in the 21st century. 我的观点是,实际上我们应该更仔细地看看这些说明,并说,也许我们所假设的男性和女性之间非常明确的区别并不像大众所说的那样明确。因此,认识到每个大脑都不同于其他大脑,而不一定只是因为大脑功能或大脑主人的性别做区分,是 21 世纪向前迈出的重要一步。 ✔更多内容见公众号【琐简英语】,回复“1”,可进入【打卡交流群】

3分钟
99+
2年前
BBC Reel|人类大脑真的只开发了10%吗?

BBC Reel|人类大脑真的只开发了10%吗?

英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等

Debunking the 10% brain myth |BBC REEL Old myths die hard and this particular one has had a long life. Do we really use just 10% of our brain? Perhaps it's because it gives us hope. If 90% of our brain is free, well, we could do so much more with it. Like solve complex problems, multitask on an epic scale, or just levitate cats. 古老的神话很难消亡,而这个特别的传言已经存在了很长时间。我们真的只用了大脑的 10%吗?也许是因为这句传言给了我们希望。如果我们大脑的 90%还有待开发,那么,我们可以利用它做更多的事情。比如解决复杂的问题,进行大规模的多任务处理,或者只是让猫漂浮起来。 For the real answer, all you have to do is, well, think for a second. The brain is one of the most costly body parts to maintain It's only 1% of our body weight but uses 50% of our glucose reserve and 20% of the oxygen we breathe. Spending 90% of all this on cells that have no use would be totally inefficient. In fact, most of it is working away most of the time. 对于真正的答案,你所要做的就是,嗯,思考一下。大脑是维护成本最高的身体部位之一。它只占我们体重的 1%,却消耗了我们 50%的葡萄糖储备和 20%的氧气。把这一切的 90%都花在毫无用处的细胞上完全没有任何效率。事实却是,几乎整个大脑大部分时间都在工作。 Indeed even daily life requires our brains to work extensively as neuroscientist Sophie Scott tells the BBC's more-or-less program: In terms of sort of the way that it functions, your brain is working away all sorts of things you don't even necessarily realize that you're doing. So talking to you now, I'm sitting upright in a chair, I'm not falling to the ground and that's actually requiring quite a lot of postural control which is occurring in my brain. 实际上,即使是日常生活也需要我们的大脑大量工作,正如神经学家索菲·斯科特在 BBC 的“或多或少”节目中说的:就大脑的运作方式而言,你的大脑在处理各种你甚至都没有意识到自己在做的事情。此刻我跟你说话,我正直挺挺地坐在椅子上,我没有掉到地上,这其实需要相当多的姿势控制运作,而这正在我的大脑中发生。 And I'm also talking to you, listening to you, looking at you, moving my hands, and doing all sorts of different actions. Which are all and perceive your sorts of different things which are all being controlled by my brain. And on top of that, I'm thinking about what I want to say. I'm thinking about all sorts of other things that are going on immediately. That's still all being underpinned by your brain, that's also subconscious and unconscious stuff going on absolutely all the time. 而且我还在和你讲话,听你说话,看着你,移动我的手,做各种不同的动作。以上这些都和感知到你的各种不同状况有关,这一切都被我的大脑控制着。除此之外,我还在思考我想说什么。我在想所有正在发生的其他事情。这仍然要靠你的大脑来支撑,而且潜意识和无意识的思考也一直在进行。 Perhaps we shouldn't think about brain capacity, but how our brain changes. New skills don't take up brain space that wasn't used before. It's all about neuroplasticity. When we do or learn new things, we train our brain to act differently. We force it to create new connections within neurons and to lose the ones we don't need. Efficient, eh? 也许我们不应该考虑大脑的容量,而应该考虑我们的大脑如何变化。学习新的技能不会占用以前没有用过的大脑空间。这都是神经可塑性的问题。当我们做或学习新事物时,我们训练我们的大脑以不同的方式行事。我们迫使它在神经元内建立新的连接,并减少我们不需要的连接。效率很高,是吗? But where does this 10% of our brain myth come from? Sophie Scott shines a light on its history. It actually comes from a self-help book from nearly a hundred years ago, and the idea there was sort of saying you can be more, you can do more with your life. And the particular unfortunate example they gave was you're only using 10% of the brain, you can do so much more if you use more of your brain. It seems to be absolutely endemic and it crops up in a popular culture. 但是,我们的大脑只开发了 10%的传言从何而来呢?索菲:斯科特为我们揭开了它的历史。这句话其实来自于近一百年前的一本自助书籍,其中的观点是说你可以做得更多,你可以用你的生命做更多的事。他们给出的一个特别不幸的例子是,你只使用了大脑的10%,如果你使用大脑的更多部分,你就可以做更多的事情。它似乎原本只是地方性的传播,可它突然出现在流行文化中。 So our brains are already amazing multitasking superheroes. Maybe we should think about how we can mold, transform and share it with others to achieve great things. 所以我们的大脑已经是了不起的超级英雄了,能兼顾多项事情。也许我们应该思考要如何塑造、改造并与别人分享它,以实现伟大的成就。 ✔更多内容见公众号【琐简英语】,回复“1”,可进入【打卡交流群】

3分钟
99+
2年前
BBC Ideas|如果人人都吃素会怎样

BBC Ideas|如果人人都吃素会怎样

英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等

What if everyone in the world went vegan? |BBC Ideas The average person eats about 40kg of meat per year. In developed countries, it's double that..or about the same weight as an adult dolphin. But experts now advise cutting down the amount of meat we eat, to help reduce climate change. So, here's a thought experiment. What if the whole world turned vegan? 平均每个人每年吃掉大约 40 公斤的肉。在发达国家,这是两倍....或与成年海豚的重量大致相同。但专家现在建议减少我们吃的肉量,以帮助减少气候变化。所以,这是一个思想实验。如果全世界人人都吃素会怎样? Around 15% of all greenhouse gasses emitted by humans are from livestock production. If we all became vegan, these emissions would be slashed. Eating meat takes up space...a lot of it. Around 80% of all farmland is dedicated to meat and dairy production. That's about the size of Europe, the US, China, and Australia combined. Meat and dairy typically provide 18% of our calories, but account for 60% of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. 人类排放的所有温室气体中,约有15%来自畜牧生产。如果我们都成为素食主义者,这些排放量就会减少。吃肉占空间...很多。大约80%的农田致力于肉类和奶制品生产。这大约相当于欧洲、美国、中国和澳大利亚的总和。肉类和奶制品通常提供我们 18%的卡路里,但占农业温室气体排放量的 60%。 A report by the UN's climate body, the IPCC, recommends we all reduce the amount of meat we eat. And also how much we waste. The report found 8-10% of all global emissions are down to food loss and food waste. But not all meat is the same. Large-scale farming of beef has a particularly high impact, and has been a big factor in the loss of the Amazon rainforest. 联合国气候机构 IPCC 的一份报告建议我们都减少吃肉的量。还有我们浪费了多少。该报告发现全球排放量的 8-10%。归结为食物损失和食物浪费。但并非所有的肉都是一样的。大规模养殖牛肉的影响特别大,是亚马逊雨林消失的一个重要因素。 When cows digest their food, they produce methane- a powerful greenhouse gas that's about 28 times more powerful than carbon dioxide over 100 years. And when cows burp, this methane is emitted. One cow releases between 70 and 100kg of methane every year, and there are around 1.5 billion cattle in the world today. 当奶牛消化食物时,它们会产生甲烷———种强大的温室气体在 100 年的时间里,这比二氧化碳的威力大约高 28 倍。当奶牛打嗝时,就会释放出这种甲烷。一头牛每年释放 70 至 100 公斤甲烷,而当今世界上约有 15 亿头牛。 But it's not that simple. A lot depends on how the meat is produced. Most meat is mass-produced by large-scale industry, and this can come with a heavy environmental impact. But small-scale farming of animals can have a lower environmental footprint. And sometimes - for example in the case of traditional grazing -it can be beneficial in terms of biodiversity. 但这不是那么简单。很大程度上取决于肉的生产方式。大多数肉类都是由大规模工业大量生产的,这会对环境造成严重影响。但是小规模的动物养殖可以减少环境足迹。有时-例如在传统放牧的情况下。就生物多样性而言,它可能是有益的。 Vegan alternatives can also come with their own problems. For example, large-scale production of soya can lead to deforestation, and almond production requires huge amounts of water. But if everyone switched to a plant-based diet, it could bring several positive health benefits. 纯素食替代品也有其自身的问题。例如,大豆的大规模生产会导致森林砍伐,杏仁生产需要大量的水。但如果每个人都改用植物性饮食,它可能会带来一些积极的健康益处。 One study estimated that if everyone ate a vegan diet- with lots of fresh fruit and veg -around eight million deaths could be avoided around the world by 2050. There are no simple answers. But if everyone were to change how they look at food, cultivate it, and eat it in a sustainable way, we could, potentially, change the world. 一项研究估计,如果每个人都吃纯素饮食——吃大量新鲜水果和蔬菜-到 2050 年,全世界可以避免大约 800 万人死亡。没有简单的答案。但如果每个人都改变他们看待食物的方式,以可持续的方式种植和食用食物,我们有可能改变世界。 Thanks for watching. Don't forget to subscribe and click the bell to receive notifications for new videos. See you again soon! 感谢收看。不要忘记订阅并点击小铃铛以接收新视频的通知。很快再见! ✔更多内容见公众号【琐简英语】,回复“1”,可进入【打卡交流群】

2分钟
99+
2年前
随身英语|季节如何影响睡眠

随身英语|季节如何影响睡眠

英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等

How the seasons affect your sleep 季节如何影响你的睡眠 After a long winter, the arrival of spring can be a welcome relief. The days grow longer, the temperatures increase, and the natural world around us comes to life again. But when the seasons change, our sleep patterns change with them. 在经历了漫长的冬天之后,春天的到来可能是一种可喜的解脱。白天变长了,温度升高了,我们周围的自然世界又复苏了。但当季节变化时,我们的睡眠模式也会随之变化。 New research suggests that humans may need more sleep in the winter than they do in the summer. A German study found that participants slept an hour longer in December than in June, regardless of their exposure to light. "Our study shows that even while living in an urban environment, with just artificial light, humans [experience] seasonal sleep," says Dieter Kunz, one of the study's lead authors and head of the clinic of sleep and chronomedicine at St Hedwig Hospital in Berlin, Germany. 新的研究表明,人类在冬天可能比夏天需要更多的睡眠。德国的一项研究发现,不管他们是否暴露在光线下,参与者在12月份比6月份多睡一个小时。“我们的研究表明,即使生活在只有人造光的城市环境中,人类也会经历季节性睡眠,”该研究的主要作者之一、德国柏林圣海德威格医院睡眠和生物钟医学诊所主任迪特尔·昆兹说。 The study found that the participants experienced seasonal variations in their rapid eye movement sleep, also known as REM sleep, as well as in their slow wave sleep, also known as deep sleep. REM sleep, which is when we dream and our heart rate increases, was 30 minutes longer in the winter than during the summer. Slow wave sleep, which is when our muscles are repaired, our immune system is strengthened and our memory is consolidated, was 30 minutes shorter in September than in February. 研究发现,参与者在快速眼动睡眠(也称REM睡眠)和慢波睡眠(也称深度睡眠)中经历了季节性变化。快速眼动睡眠,也就是我们做梦和心跳加速的时候,冬天比夏天多30分钟。慢波睡眠是指我们的肌肉得到修复,免疫系统得到增强,记忆力得到巩固的时候,九月份的慢波睡眠比二月份少了30分钟。 But why do our bodies and brains need more rest at certain times of year? The answer could lie in our evolutionary past. That's according to Neil Stanley, who's a sleep expert at Sleep Station, an online provider of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia. "We have evolved to dark-light cycles, so when we wake up on a winter's morning and it's dark, our brain is going 'I can't do anything… there's no point leaping out of bed.'" Particularly in summer, temperature also plays a role – our bodies require a skin temperature of between 31-35 degrees centigrade [Celsius] for a good night's sleep, but this can be harder to control during the warmer months. 但是为什么我们的身体和大脑在一年中的某些时候需要更多的休息呢?答案可能在于我们的进化史。睡眠研究所的睡眠专家尼尔 · 斯坦利是这样说的。睡眠研究所是一家为失眠症提供认知行为疗法的网站。“我们已经进化到了光暗循环,所以当我们在冬天的早晨醒来,天是黑的,我们的大脑就会想‘我什么也做不了... ... 没有必要从床上跳起来。’”特别是在夏天,温度也起到了一定的作用——我们的身体需要31-35摄氏度的皮肤温度才能睡个好觉,但是在温暖的月份,这就很难控制了。 Of course, nowadays, it is our school and work times – not the Sun – that determine when we get up in the morning. But, as autumn approaches, it seems we now have a good excuse for an early night. 当然,现在决定我们早上什么时候起床的是我们的学校和工作时间,而不是太阳。但是,随着秋天的临近,我们似乎有了一个很好的借口,可以早点睡觉了。 词汇表 relief (不快后的)解脱 come to life 复苏,恢复生机 sleep pattern 睡眠模式 exposure to 接触 artificial light 人造光 seasonal sleep 季节性睡眠 chronomedicine 时间医学 variation 变化 rapid eye movement sleep 快速眼动睡眠 slow wave sleep 慢波睡眠 deep sleep 深度睡眠 repair 修复 immune system 免疫系统 consolidate 加强,加固 rest 休息 cognitive behavioural therapy 认知行为疗法 insomnia 失眠 evolve 逐渐进化 dark-light cycle (昼夜)光暗循环 leap out of bed 跳下床,起床 early night 早睡 ✔更多内容见公众号【琐简英语】,回复“1”,可进入【打卡交流群】

2分钟
99+
2年前
BBC Media|白金汉宫东翼将首次向公众开放

BBC Media|白金汉宫东翼将首次向公众开放

英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等

Buckingham Palace wing to open to visitors 英国白金汉宫东翼将首次向公众开放 For the first time, the public will be able to go on guided tours of Buckingham Palace's East Wing. That includes the famous front facade with a balcony that's been the focus of so many big royal occasions, although visitors won't be able to step out onto the balcony and wave to the tourists below. 这将是公众首次能够在导游的带领下参观白金汉宫东翼。可供参观的区域包括宫殿正面著名的标志性阳台,这座阳台是许多重大王室活动的焦点,不过参观者不能像王室那样走上阳台,向下面的游客们挥手。 But in July and August, visitors will be able to see many historic rooms in that wing of the palace previously not open to the public as part of an effort to open up more of the royal estate. 王室希望能开放更多居所供民众参观,在今年7月和8月,游客们将能够参观白金汉宫东翼许多历史悠久的房间,这些房间此前从未向公众开放。 The palace's East Wing, built in the reign of Queen Victoria, was originally funded by selling the Brighton Pavilion. But modern visitors who want the guided tour, plus a visit to the palace's State Rooms, will have to pay £75. 白金汉宫东翼建于英国维多利亚女王统治时期,最初修建该区域靠出售布莱顿皇家行宫(又称 “英王阁”)所得的资金。而如今游客如果想参加这个由导游带领的东翼游览活动,包括参观国事厅,就必须支付75英镑的游览费。 词汇表 facade (大型建筑物的)正立面 step out 走出 royal estate 王室居所 reign 统治时期,君主在位时期 funded 由…提供资金 State Rooms (白金汉宫)国事厅 ✔更多内容见公众号【琐简英语】,回复“1”,可进入【打卡交流群】

0分钟
99+
2年前
BBC Ideas|为什么有些人选择不用社交媒体

BBC Ideas|为什么有些人选择不用社交媒体

英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等

Why people are choosing to quit social media| BBC Ideas​ I'm not sure that other people on the Tube would be happy, but I look at other people more. I like to observe, have a look at what someone's wearing, you know, imagine what sort of person they would be. Just try and live in the moment a bit more. That's right. No Facebook, no Twitter. No Instagram, no WhatsApp. 我不确定地铁上的其他人会不会高兴,但我更多地关注其他人。我喜欢观察,看看别人穿什么,你知道的,想象他们会是什么样的人。试着多活在当下。这是正确的。没有脸书,没有推特。 What triggered it was a break up. I think when something like that happens, you need to just let someone die a social media death and just remove them from your life. And then I realised that actually they weren't that useful to me anyway. So I just went the whole hog and didnit bother using them ever again. 没有 Instagram,没有 WhatsApp。触发它的是分手。我认为当发生这样的事情时,你需要让某人沉寂于社交媒体,并将它们从你的生活中移除。然后我意识到实际上它们对我来说并没有那么有用。所以我只是全力以赴,再也没有费心使用它们。 The point about social media is the addictiveness. Nobody really wants to spend hours and hours every day updating their status and seeing what other people think about them. Nobody consciously wants to do that, but those behaviours are themselves addictive behaviours. Once you're trapped in that loop it's very hard to break out. It's not that we want to go back to some idylic past-an Eden before the machines existed. It's that we need to take control of these machines and use them for their proper ends. 关于社交媒体的重点是上瘾性。没有人真的愿意每天花几个小时更新他们的状态,看看其他人对他们的看法。没有人有意识地想这样做,但这些行为本身就是上瘾行为。一旦陷入这个循环,就很难跳出来。这并不是说我们想回到田园诗般的过去——机器出现之前的伊甸园。而是我们需要控制这些机器并将它们用于适当的目的。 The bad thing is that you think people's lives are much more fun than your own life. When I'm the bus,I just see people like zombies and I'm like,"Alright, it's a sunny day. There is something to see, not only your phone. "糟糕的是,你认为别人的生活比你自己的生活有趣得多。当我在公共汽车上时,我只是看到像僵尸一样的人,我就像,“好吧,这是一个阳光明媚的日子。有东西可看,不仅仅是你的手机。” I like to be present when I share something about myself with someone, so I can get their feedback and either stop right there or tell them the story behind it, or give context. Sometimes I might withhold a certain opinion rather than being kind of rapid fire, because maybe it requires a bit of nuance. And maybe the best thing is not for me to just shoot my mouth off online because some headine made me angry. The thing is, the world is real, whether we want to believe it or not, and it's really important for us to have a sense of where we are in that world. 当我与某人分享一些关于我自己的事情时,我喜欢在场;这样我就可以得到他们的反馈,或者就此打住,或者告诉他们背后的故事,或者提供背景信息。有时我可能会保留某种意见而不是快速开火,因为这可能需要一些细微差别。也许对我来说最好的事情不是因为某些新闻标题让我生气而在网上大声疾呼。问题是,世界是真实的,无论我们是否愿意相信,对我们来说,有一种感觉真的很重要我们在那个世界的位置。 I don't like to use the term social media, at the end of the day, because it implies that it's designed to promote social behaviours when usually it's designed to promote the amount of attention that we're giving it. In order to grab our attention-because there's so much competition -design has to appeal to the lower parts of us, to the kind of non-rational, automatic, impulsive parts of us. 我不喜欢使用社交媒体这个词,归根结底,因为它暗示它旨在促进社会行为,而通常它旨在促进我们给予它的关注程度。为了吸引我们的注意力——因为竞争太激烈了——设计必须吸引我们较隐蔽的部分,吸引我们非理性的、自动的、冲动的部分。 And so this is why we get things like clickbait, like sensationalism- things that appeal to our outrage. And there's a whole industry of consultants, of psychologists who are helping designers really punch the right buttons in our brains so that we do keep coming back for more and we do stay hooked on the products. At the end of the day, they're advertising systems, not really social platforms. 因此,这就是为什么我们会得到点击诱饵、哗众取宠之类的东西—一引起我们愤怒的东西。整个行业都有顾问,心理学家,他们正在帮助设计师真正在我们的大脑中点击想要的按钮,这样我们就会不断回来获取更多信息,并且我们会一直沉迷于产品。归根结底,它们是广告系统,而不是真正的社交平台。 Some of them take social media breaks quite a lot anyway, so it's not like I'm doing something that's particularly divergent, but they think it's a good thing. I think they realise, we all realise, that we look at memes too much, we use Instagram too much. It's just whether we realise that and do something about it. There are things that give us instant pleasure and they're like the more gluttonous things like food and sex and stuff like that, and they give us a really high spike of pleasure. 无论如何,他们中的一些人经常在社交媒体上休息,所以这并不是说我在做一些特别不同的事情,但他们认为这是一件好事。我认为他们意识到,我们都意识到,我们看模因太多了,我们过度使用 Instagram。只是我们是否意识到这一点并为此做点什么。有些东西能给我们带来即时的快乐,它们就像更诱人的东西,比如食物和性之类的东西,它们能给我们带来非常强的快感。 But the things that are the most worthwhile are the things that you spend a lot of time on. So playing the piano is not pleasant to begin with but you get a much more steady wave of satisfaction. So it does matter, because the pleasures that are sometimes the most time-consuming or the ones that take the most work can be the ones that are the most fulfilling. Those are the pleasures that are self-actualizing, that help you realise a part of yourself that you didn't have. I'm on it probably every day, just to be nosy. I'm sure I could live without it. We did before, didn't we? 我可能每天都在用,只是因为八卦。我确定我可以没有它。我们以前就是这样,不是吗? ✔更多内容见公众号【琐简英语】,回复“1”,可进入【打卡交流群】

4分钟
99+
2年前
随身英语|呼吸训练的益处

随身英语|呼吸训练的益处

英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等

Struggling with insomnia? Worried by anxiety? The first piece of advice that you are likely to see is to try breathing exercises. From ancient yoga practitioners to modern health professionals, experts have made this recommendation. But how can simple breathing activities have such a significant effect on our mental and physical health? 与失眠作斗争?因焦虑而担忧?你可能会看到的第一条建议是尝试呼吸练习。从古代瑜伽练习者到现代健康专家,专家们都提出了这一建议。但是简单的呼吸活动怎么会对我们的精神和身体健康产生如此重大的影响呢? Once we consider how essential oxygen is for life, it might seem obvious that focusing on this can help our health. Our nervous system instinctively regulates the flow of oxygen into our lungs. Possibly because of body image concerns, many people hold in their stomachs, taking shallow breaths. This can lead our body to increase our breathing rate to compensate. 一旦我们考虑到氧气对生命的重要性,关注这一点显然有助于我们的健康。我们的神经系统本能地调节氧气流入肺部。可能是出于对身体形象的考虑,许多人都憋着气,浅呼吸。这可以导致我们的身体增加呼吸频率来补偿。 Our breathing also gets faster when we're stressed or anxious. When this happens, our sympathetic nervous system triggers a fight-or-flight response. As well as affecting breathing, this increases our heart rate and produces adrenaline to prepare our muscles for action. Stress and anxiety can thus be linked with rapid breathing. 当我们感到压力或焦虑时,我们的呼吸也会变快。当这种情况发生时,我们的交感神经系统会触发战斗或逃跑反应。这不仅会影响呼吸,还会增加我们的心率,产生肾上腺素,让我们的肌肉为行动做好准备。因此,压力和焦虑可能与呼吸急促有关。 To recover from a threat, our parasympathetic nervous system can put our body into a rest-and-digest state allowing us to relax and be calm. In this state, breathing and heart rates slow. However, it appears that slow, deep breathing can also make this happen. It's also notable that when we focus on breathing techniques, we can be distracted from the issues that are causing us stress. 为了从威胁中恢复过来,我们的副交感神经系统可以让我们的身体进入休息和消化状态,让我们放松和冷静。在这种状态下,呼吸和心率减慢。然而,缓慢的深呼吸似乎也能使这种情况发生。同样值得注意的是,当我们专注于呼吸技巧时,我们可以从导致我们压力的问题上分散注意力。 Experts recommend using our diaphragm to inhale deeply, filling our lungs completely and then holding our breath for a few seconds before exhaling. Other recommended techniques include breathing through alternating nostrils. So next time you feel anxious or stressed, why not try some breathing techniques to help you relax? 专家建议使用我们的横膈膜深深吸气,完全充满我们的肺部,然后在呼气前屏住呼吸几秒钟。其他推荐的技巧包括交替鼻孔呼吸。所以下次你感到焦虑或压力时,为什么不尝试一些呼吸技巧来帮助你放松呢? 词汇表 insomnia 失眠 anxiety 焦虑,不安 breathing exercise 呼吸训练 oxygen 氧气 instinctively 本能地 flow 供应,流动 lung 肺,肺部 shallow (呼吸)浅的 breath 气息 breathing rate 呼吸频率 sympathetic nervous system 交感神经系统 fight-or-flight response 战斗或逃跑反应 rapid breathing 呼吸急促 parasympathetic nervous system 副交感神经系统 rest-and-digest state (身体的)“休息和消化” 状态 breathing technique 呼吸技巧 diaphragm (横)隔膜 inhale 吸气 hold someone's breath 屏住呼吸 exhale 呼气 nostril 鼻孔 ✔更多内容见公众号【琐简英语】,回复“1”,可进入【打卡交流群】

2分钟
99+
2年前
BBC Newsround|缺勤:主流学校并不适合所有人

BBC Newsround|缺勤:主流学校并不适合所有人

英音听力|BBC & 经济学人等

School Absences:"Mainstream school doesn't suit everyone"| Newsround There's currently a problem with some pupils being off school for long periods. It's something lots of people are worried about and the issue has become worse since the coronavirus pandemic. And there's lots of reasons behind it. Some children have found it difficult returning to the classroom full-time. After Covid lockdowns, many of these children experience anxiety or have educational needs, meaning they require more support, which can be difficult, to get in a mainstream school. And lots of parents are working from home now, which means it's easier to keep kids off school. 目前存在一些学生长时间不上学的问题。这是很多人担心的事情,自冠状病毒大流行以来,这个问题变得更加严重。这背后有很多原因。一些孩子发现很难全职回到教室。在COVID封锁之后,这些孩子中的许多人会感到焦虑或有教育需求,这意味着他们需要更多的支持,而这在主流学校可能很难获得。现在很多家长都在家工作,这意味着让孩子们更容易辍学。 One way it's being addressed is alternative provisions, a place which provides education for children outside of mainstream school. I've come to this one in Yorkshire. It's held in a church hall with seven pupils and three teachers. I first met Dion who spends four days a week here and one day back at his other school. Dion struggled with work and behaviour at his old school, so what difference has it made coming here? 解决这一问题的一种方式是替代性规定,即为主流学校以外的儿童提供教育的地方。我来到约克郡的一个。它在一个教堂大厅举行,有七名学生和三名教师。我第一次见到迪翁,他每周在这里呆四天,回到另一所学校一天。迪翁在他原来的学校里为工作和行为而苦苦挣扎,那么来到这里有什么不同呢? It's made me be able to concentrate a lot more and tell when to like not do stuff that I'm not meant to do. What's your favourite thing about coming to this school? Definitely being able to talk to someone, being able to take a break. Probably the fact that there's less people and usually It's not exactly calm but it's not as stressful or as hectic as a normal school. 它让我能够更加集中注意力,并知道何时,比如不做我不该做的事情。来到这所学校你最喜欢的事情是什么?绝对是能够与某人交谈,能够休息一下。可能是因为人比较少,而且通常这里并不完全平静,但也不像普通学校那么紧张或忙碌。 So what difference is there between your mainstream school and coming to school here? You don't have to have a uniform and that's really nice because it gives you the freedom to weanr whatever you want really and you get to keep your coat on if you're like cold or you just want to keep it on because of comfort and you're able to just take a break out of a lesson if you're getting really stressed or worried or you just need a break and the fact that you get to have a blanket it's just really comfy and yeah it's just really nice. No uniforms, fewer students and smaller classrooms are just some of the differences to mainstream school. Overall, the day runs very similar, starting with English and Maths in the morning, followed by reading together and then online learning in the afternoon. Pupils usually come here for a short period, giving them a chance to take a break, which will hopefully help them return to their usual schools when they're ready. The small space and fewer pupils can really help those students with anxiety. Evie is in year 11 and has been coming for a year. She struggled getting back into school after lockdown. Can you just explain to me, so when you wake up and you're feeling anxious and, you know, struggling to go into school, what does that feel like? What does anxiety feel like? I'll normally start shaking or fidgeting and sometimes I can feel sick and then sometimes I'll just shut down and I won't speak and I just refuse to do anything. What's it like coming to school here? It's a lot calmer because you've got all the day to speak to somebody if there's anything wrong. And you can relate to everyone because we all know we're here for similar reasons. So what difference do you think being at the school has made to you? It's prepared me to go to college and it's been helpful because I've been able to speak to Gav or speak to Rachel if there's anything wrong and I can take time out if I need to, if I'm getting anxious or anything. I spoke to Gav, who's head of the centre here, about what it's like running this provision. It's an absolute privilege to work with these young people. 'I've done it for so many years and to see someone come through the doors that's really struggling with their education, but to be able to give them the time and the things that they need in life in the hope that they will go back into their mainstream environment is just phenomenal. The children here are having a positive experience taking a break from mainstream education but if they were in charge of schools what changes would they want to see? I just think they need to like kind of understand that not everyone's the same and some people will do struggle and will struggle for like the amount of time they are in school. When a student is struggling they can't just necessarily expect him to go straight to the lessons if they're upset or anything. They need to at least give them a bit of time to calm down. Well, a mainstream school definitely doesn't suit everyone because everyone has different needs and stuff and it's just not for everyone. ✔更多内容见公众号【琐简英语】,回复“1”,可进入【打卡交流群】

4分钟
99+
2年前

加入我们的 Discord

与播客爱好者一起交流

立即加入

扫描微信二维码

添加微信好友,获取更多播客资讯

微信二维码

播放列表

自动播放下一个

播放列表还是空的

去找些喜欢的节目添加进来吧