美轮美换 The American Roulette
091 | 2026高院判决盘点：法理左右互搏，对特朗普“小骂大帮忙” 2026 Supreme Court Rulings
109分钟
7,683
5天前
主播
节目简介
来源：小宇宙
【聊了什么】
同样讨论总统罢免权，FTC 不是例外，美联储却是；同样声称尊重文本和原意，保守派大法官在出生公民权、投票权和跨性别权益案中，却一次次更换自己的法理工具。
本期我们与 Nancy、品达一起盘点美国最高法院 2025-2026 开庭期：特朗普的“单一行政权”走到了哪一步？谁仍然被视为美国人？《投票权法》还剩下多少效力？跨性别学生为什么被排除在女子校队之外？当法院的判决越来越只能用政治解释，偶尔对特朗普说“不”，究竟是制度制衡，还是“小骂大帮忙”？
【支持我们】
如果喜欢这期节目并希望支持我们将节目继续做下去：
也欢迎加入我们的会员计划： https://theamericanroulette.com/paid-membership/
会员可以收到每周2-5封newsletter，可以加入会员社群，参加会员活动，并享受更多福利。
合作投稿邮箱：[email protected]
【时间轴】
01:39 FTC 与美联储：特朗普能解雇谁
08:02 “单一行政权”如何成为保守派共识
28:29 出生公民权与谁算“美国人”
43:31 TPS 终止：移民身份和司法审查
53:35 投票权法、黑人选区与政治划区
1:02:02 最高法院还有稳定法理吗
1:13:01 跨性别学生参加女子体育案
1:20:53 校园体育为什么不能套用精英体育逻辑
1:33:32 Alito 退休乌龙与大法官的个人政治
1:41:21 Barrett 为什么总成为右翼攻击目标
1:44:36 法院改革与对特朗普“小骂大帮忙”
【我们是谁】
美轮美换是一档深入探讨当今美国政治的中文播客。
本期的主播和嘉宾：
Lokin：美国法学院毕业生，即将成为一名纽约诉讼律师
王浩岚：美国政治爱好者，岚目公众号主笔兼消息二道贩子
Nancy：普林斯顿大学政治学博士生，耶鲁法学院法律博士
品达：美国政治观察人士，《孤岛繁星》主播
【 What We Talked About】
When considering the same question of presidential removal power, the Court decided that the FTC was not an exception, but the Federal Reserve was. And while the conservative justices continue to profess their commitment to textualism and originalism, they repeatedly switched doctrinal tools in cases involving birthright citizenship, voting rights, and transgender rights.
In this episode, Nancy and Pinda join us to review the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2025-2026 term. How far has Trump’s vision of the “unitary executive” advanced? Who still counts as American? How much remains of the Voting Rights Act? Why can transgender students be excluded from girls’ school sports? As the Court’s decisions become increasingly difficult to explain through legal doctrine alone, do its occasional rulings against Trump represent genuine institutional checks, or merely “small rebukes, big assists”?
【Support Us】
If you like our show and want to support us, please consider the following:
Join our membership program: https://theamericanroulette.com/paid-membership/
Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/americanroulette
Business Inquiries and fan mail: [email protected]
【Timeline】
01:39 The FTC and the Federal Reserve: Whom can Trump fire?
08:02 How the “unitary executive” became a conservative consensus
28:29 Birthright citizenship and who counts as “American”
43:31 Ending TPS: Immigration status and judicial review
53:35 The Voting Rights Act, majority-Black districts, and partisan redistricting
1:02:02 Does the Supreme Court still have a coherent legal doctrine?
1:13:01 The case over transgender students participating in girls’ sports
1:20:53 Why school sports cannot be judged by the logic of elite athletics
1:33:32 The false report of Alito’s retirement and the personal politics of the justices
1:41:21 Why Barrett remains a favorite target of the right
1:44:36 Court reform and the Supreme Court’s “small rebukes, big assists” approach to Trump
【Who We Are】
The American Roulette is a podcast dedicated to helping the Chinese-speaking community understand fast-changing U.S. politics.
Our Hosts and Guests:
Lokin: U.S. law school student, incoming NY litigation lawyer
王浩岚 (Haolan Wang): American political enthusiast, chief writer at Lán Mù WeChat Official Account, and peddler of information
Nancy：Princeton Politics PhD student, Yale Law School graduate
Pinda：American political enthusiast
【The Links】
* Trump v. Slaughter：总统罢免 FTC 委员与“单一行政权”
* Trump v. Cook：总统罢免美联储理事与央行独立性
* Trump v. Barbara：出生公民权
* Mullin v. Doe：海地与叙利亚 TPS 终止及司法审查
* Louisiana v. Callais：黑人多数选区与《投票权法》第二条
* West Virginia v. B. P. J.：跨性别学生参加女子体育运动
* 《纽约时报》：TPS 被终止后，美国部分行业面临劳动力短缺
* Harvard Kennedy School：Louisiana v. Callais 对《投票权法》意味着什么
* 《纽约时报》：最高法院跨性别学生体育案的当事人 Becky Pepper-Jackson
* Becky Pepper-Jackson 的母亲：这个母亲节，我感谢跨性别女儿教会我的事
* ACLU：关于跨性别运动员的四个常见迷思
* NPR Public Editor：Nina Totenberg 误报 Alito 退休事件的经过
* 《纽约时报》：Amy Coney Barrett 为何再次遭到共和党右翼攻击
* 《纽约时报》：Ketanji Brown Jackson 做客 Michelle Obama 播客
* IMO with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson：Ketanji Brown Jackson 访谈
* Slow Burn: Becoming Justice Gorsuch
* Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935)：FTC 独立性与正当理由解雇
* Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024)：推翻 Chevron deference
* Seila Law v. CFPB (2020)：单一局长制与总统罢免权
* United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898)：“黄金德案”与出生公民权
* Thornburg v. Gingles (1986)：《投票权法》第二条的 Gingles 标准
* Shelby County v. Holder (2013)：削弱《投票权法》的关键判决
Support on Patreon | 爱发电上赞助
同样讨论总统罢免权，FTC 不是例外，美联储却是；同样声称尊重文本和原意，保守派大法官在出生公民权、投票权和跨性别权益案中，却一次次更换自己的法理工具。
本期我们与 Nancy、品达一起盘点美国最高法院 2025-2026 开庭期：特朗普的“单一行政权”走到了哪一步？谁仍然被视为美国人？《投票权法》还剩下多少效力？跨性别学生为什么被排除在女子校队之外？当法院的判决越来越只能用政治解释，偶尔对特朗普说“不”，究竟是制度制衡，还是“小骂大帮忙”？
【支持我们】
如果喜欢这期节目并希望支持我们将节目继续做下去：
也欢迎加入我们的会员计划： https://theamericanroulette.com/paid-membership/
会员可以收到每周2-5封newsletter，可以加入会员社群，参加会员活动，并享受更多福利。
合作投稿邮箱：[email protected]
【时间轴】
01:39 FTC 与美联储：特朗普能解雇谁
08:02 “单一行政权”如何成为保守派共识
28:29 出生公民权与谁算“美国人”
43:31 TPS 终止：移民身份和司法审查
53:35 投票权法、黑人选区与政治划区
1:02:02 最高法院还有稳定法理吗
1:13:01 跨性别学生参加女子体育案
1:20:53 校园体育为什么不能套用精英体育逻辑
1:33:32 Alito 退休乌龙与大法官的个人政治
1:41:21 Barrett 为什么总成为右翼攻击目标
1:44:36 法院改革与对特朗普“小骂大帮忙”
【我们是谁】
美轮美换是一档深入探讨当今美国政治的中文播客。
本期的主播和嘉宾：
Lokin：美国法学院毕业生，即将成为一名纽约诉讼律师
王浩岚：美国政治爱好者，岚目公众号主笔兼消息二道贩子
Nancy：普林斯顿大学政治学博士生，耶鲁法学院法律博士
品达：美国政治观察人士，《孤岛繁星》主播
【 What We Talked About】
When considering the same question of presidential removal power, the Court decided that the FTC was not an exception, but the Federal Reserve was. And while the conservative justices continue to profess their commitment to textualism and originalism, they repeatedly switched doctrinal tools in cases involving birthright citizenship, voting rights, and transgender rights.
In this episode, Nancy and Pinda join us to review the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2025-2026 term. How far has Trump’s vision of the “unitary executive” advanced? Who still counts as American? How much remains of the Voting Rights Act? Why can transgender students be excluded from girls’ school sports? As the Court’s decisions become increasingly difficult to explain through legal doctrine alone, do its occasional rulings against Trump represent genuine institutional checks, or merely “small rebukes, big assists”?
【Support Us】
If you like our show and want to support us, please consider the following:
Join our membership program: https://theamericanroulette.com/paid-membership/
Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/americanroulette
Business Inquiries and fan mail: [email protected]
【Timeline】
01:39 The FTC and the Federal Reserve: Whom can Trump fire?
08:02 How the “unitary executive” became a conservative consensus
28:29 Birthright citizenship and who counts as “American”
43:31 Ending TPS: Immigration status and judicial review
53:35 The Voting Rights Act, majority-Black districts, and partisan redistricting
1:02:02 Does the Supreme Court still have a coherent legal doctrine?
1:13:01 The case over transgender students participating in girls’ sports
1:20:53 Why school sports cannot be judged by the logic of elite athletics
1:33:32 The false report of Alito’s retirement and the personal politics of the justices
1:41:21 Why Barrett remains a favorite target of the right
1:44:36 Court reform and the Supreme Court’s “small rebukes, big assists” approach to Trump
【Who We Are】
The American Roulette is a podcast dedicated to helping the Chinese-speaking community understand fast-changing U.S. politics.
Our Hosts and Guests:
Lokin: U.S. law school student, incoming NY litigation lawyer
王浩岚 (Haolan Wang): American political enthusiast, chief writer at Lán Mù WeChat Official Account, and peddler of information
Nancy：Princeton Politics PhD student, Yale Law School graduate
Pinda：American political enthusiast
【The Links】
* Trump v. Slaughter：总统罢免 FTC 委员与“单一行政权”
* Trump v. Cook：总统罢免美联储理事与央行独立性
* Trump v. Barbara：出生公民权
* Mullin v. Doe：海地与叙利亚 TPS 终止及司法审查
* Louisiana v. Callais：黑人多数选区与《投票权法》第二条
* West Virginia v. B. P. J.：跨性别学生参加女子体育运动
* 《纽约时报》：TPS 被终止后，美国部分行业面临劳动力短缺
* Harvard Kennedy School：Louisiana v. Callais 对《投票权法》意味着什么
* 《纽约时报》：最高法院跨性别学生体育案的当事人 Becky Pepper-Jackson
* Becky Pepper-Jackson 的母亲：这个母亲节，我感谢跨性别女儿教会我的事
* ACLU：关于跨性别运动员的四个常见迷思
* NPR Public Editor：Nina Totenberg 误报 Alito 退休事件的经过
* 《纽约时报》：Amy Coney Barrett 为何再次遭到共和党右翼攻击
* 《纽约时报》：Ketanji Brown Jackson 做客 Michelle Obama 播客
* IMO with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson：Ketanji Brown Jackson 访谈
* Slow Burn: Becoming Justice Gorsuch
* Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935)：FTC 独立性与正当理由解雇
* Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024)：推翻 Chevron deference
* Seila Law v. CFPB (2020)：单一局长制与总统罢免权
* United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898)：“黄金德案”与出生公民权
* Thornburg v. Gingles (1986)：《投票权法》第二条的 Gingles 标准
* Shelby County v. Holder (2013)：削弱《投票权法》的关键判决
Support on Patreon | 爱发电上赞助
外观
