鸟瘾综合征 - 节目列表

《荷马史诗》里的鸟，藏着古希腊人惊人的自然观察力。成书于公元前8世纪的《伊利亚特》和《奥德赛》记录了三十多种鸟，细节精准得让现代鸟类学家惊叹。希腊人关注鸟类的解剖特征与行为逻辑，我们的先民则赋予了鸟深厚的道德与政治寓意。 东西方文明不约而同地将观察写入天空。一方是严谨的“野外解剖学”，一方是温情的“道德物候学”，羽毛翻飞间，就能映照出我们人类理解世界的两种浪漫路径。 战神和智慧女神雅典娜头盔上的小鸮 古希腊的装饰品 在雕塑柱子上的猫头鹰 参考文献： * Boraston, J. Maclair. "The Birds of Homer." The Journal of Hellenic Studies, vol. 31, 1911, pp. 216–250. * Mutschler, Fritz-Heiner (ed.). The Homeric Epics and the Chinese Book of Songs: Foundational Texts Compared. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2018. * Arnott, W. Geoffrey. Birds in the Ancient World from A to Z. London & New York: Routledge, 2007. * Johansson, Karin. The Birds in the Iliad: Identities, Interactions and Functions. (Gothenburg Studies in History, 2). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 2012. * 颜重威. 《诗经里的鸟类》. 台北: 乡宇文化, 2004. * 招祥麒. 《诗歌，使鸟的生命延展永生——谈〈诗经〉中的鸟》. 灼见名家 (Master Insight), 2023. * 《人民论坛》编辑部. 《中国古代保护鸟类的道德义务、执行机构及精神历程》. 《人民论坛》期刊, 2025. * 中央纪委国家监委网站. 《“关关雎鸠”的雎鸠是什么鸟：传统文化名物考》. 中央纪委监察部网站客户端, 2017. * 中国教育新闻网. 《先秦与汉魏古典诗歌中的禽鸟意象演变》. 中国教育报/文化专栏, 2019. * 香港岭南大学中文系. 《诗经里的鸟民族——“天命玄鸟，降而生商”与上古鸟图腾考》. 岭南大学学术典藏, 2018. * 国家林业和草原局. 《〈诗经〉名物博物考：风诗中的“鸠”与古人观鸟》. 国家林草局科普专栏, 2026. * 光明网. 《〈关雎〉与先秦贵族审美及鸟类象征》. 《光明日报》文学遗产版, 2021. * 科技大观园. 《“多识于鸟兽草木之名”：〈论语〉与〈诗经〉中的自然认知》. 科技部科普数据库. * 香港特别行政区政府教育局. 《高中中国语文科推荐篇章导读：〈周南·关雎〉》. 课程发展处, 2021

人类对鸟类的痴迷自古有之，而且传统的鸟类研究也充满艰辛。科学家常有的最大的难题莫过于“认鸟”：在外观相似的鸟类中，如何分辨谁是“张三”谁是“李四”？ 现在，AI成了科研利器。在个体识别上，科学家发明了“鸟脸打卡机”。在行为学研究中，机器鸟“芬哥”惊艳亮相。在工业防范方面，风电场利用双目立体视觉和三级虚拟围栏技术，精准区分几百米外的猛禽和一般鸟类，实现“按需停机”。 中间的就是机械鸟“芬哥” 参考文献： Ferreira, A. C., Silva, L. R., Renna, F., Brandl, H. B., Renoult, J. P., Farine, D. R., Covas, R., & Doutrelant, C. (2020). Deep learning-based methods for individual recognition in small birds. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(9), 1072–1085. DOI : 10.1111/2041-210X.13436 Simon, R., Varkevisser, J., Mendoza, E., Hochradel, K., Elsinga, R., Wiersma, P. G., Middelburg, E., Zoeter, E., Scharff, C., Riebel, K., & Halfwerk, W. (2023). RoboFinch: A versatile audio-visual synchronised robotic bird model for laboratory and field research on songbirds. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 14(4), 1092–1103. DOI : 10.1111/2041-210X.14063 Goodman, B. D., Lima, K. A., Benz, S., Fisichelli, N. A., & Kitzes, J. (2025). Humans outperform Merlin Sound ID in field-based point-count surveys. Ornithological Applications, 127(4), duaf049. DOI : 10.1093/ornithapp/duaf049 Chalmers, C., Fergus, P., Wich, S., Longmore, S. N., Walsh, N. D., Oliver, L., Warrington, J., Quinlan, J., & Appleby, K. (2025). AI-Driven Real-Time Monitoring of Ground-Nesting Birds: A Case Study on Curlew Detection Using YOLOv10. Remote Sensing, 17(5), 769. DOI : 10.3390/rs17050769 Kahl, S., Wood, C. M., Eibl, M., & Klinck, H. (2021). BirdNET: A deep learning solution for avian diversity monitoring. Ecological Informatics, 61, 101236. DOI : 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101236 Brighton, C., Clarke, J., & Boersch-Supan, P. (2025). Scientific support to the trial of Spoor AI at the European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre. BTO Research Report, 781, 109. Klar, N., Gifary, N., Ziegler, F. P. G., Sehnke, F., Kaifel, A., Price, E., & Ahmad, A. (2025). BirdRecorder's AI on Sky: Safeguarding birds of prey by detection and classification of tiny objects around wind turbines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18136. Mund, J.-P., & Rieger, S. (2023). Remote Sensing Methods Combined with Anti-collision Systems to Reduce Avian Collisions with Wind Turbines, Facilitating the Energy Transition. Advances in GIScience, 2(2), 69–87. DOI : 10.1553/giscience2023_02_s69 BGM：Will you love me tomorrow - Carole King

最近有一项新的科学研究，结果很有意思 - 公园里的鸟，居然更“怕”女生？ 这篇文章在2025年底发表于《People and Nature》，横跨了欧洲五国七城，对37种共2701只鸟进行了精密的测试。结果发现：在面对女性的时候，鸟类的“惊飞距离”（FID）平均多出整整1米！这意味着，鸟类允许男性比女性多靠近11%的距离才逃跑。为什么会这样？什么原因呢？那请您听我们聊聊吧！ 参考文献： Morelli F, Benedetti Y, Mikula P, et al. (2026). Sex matters: European urban birds flee approaching women sooner than approaching men. People and Nature, 8: 316–326. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.70226 Ydenberg RC, Dill LM. (1986). The economics of fleeing from predators. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 16: 229–249. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60192-8 Blumstein DT. (2006). Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: How life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds. Animal Behaviour, 71: 389–399. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.05.010 Weston MA, McLeod EM, Blumstein DT, Guay PJ. (2012). A review of flight-initiation distances and their application to managing disturbance to Australian birds. Emu, 112: 269–286. DOI: 10.1071/MU12026 Møller AP. (2008). Flight distance of urban birds, predation, and selection for urban life. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 63: 63–75. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-008-0636-y Samia DSM, Blumstein DT, Díaz M, et al. (2017). Rural–urban differences in escape behavior of European birds across a latitudinal gradient. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 5: 66. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00066 Nepali A, Katuwal HB, Kc S, et al. (2024). Flight initiation distance and bird tolerance to humans in rural and urban habitats. Royal Society Open Science, 11: 240332. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240332 Coetzer C, Bouwman H. (2017). Waterbird flight initiation distances at Barberspan Bird Sanctuary, South Africa. Koedoe, 59(1): a1419. DOI: 10.4102/koedoe.v59i1.1419 Seco Pon JP, et al. (2026). Risk-taking behavior in three Fulica species inhabiting an urban coastal lagoon in Mar del Plata city, Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Ecología Austral, 36: 176–189. DOI: 10.25260/EA.26.36.2.0.2607 Morelli F, Mikula P, Blumstein DT, et al. (2022). Flight initiation distance and refuge in urban birds. Science of the Total Environment, 842: 156939. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156939 Møller AP, Liang W, Samia DSM. (2019). Flight initiation distance, color and camouflage. Current Zoology, 65: 535–540. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoz005 Morelli F, Benedetti Y, Díaz M, et al. (2019). Contagious fear: Escape behavior increases with flock size in European gregarious birds. Ecology and Evolution, 9: 6096–6104. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5193 Kalb N, Anger F, Randler C. (2019). Flight initiation distance and escape behavior in the black redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros). Ethology, 125: 430–438. DOI: 10.1111/eth.12867 Zhou B, Liang W. (2020). Avian escape responses to observers wearing clothing of different colors: A comparison of urban and rural populations. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22: e00921. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00921 Yuan K, Yang S, et al. (2024). Responses of birds to observers holding popguns: Hunting history influences escape behavior of urban birds. Current Zoology, 70: 631–636. DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoad049 Sorge RE, Martin LJ, Isbester KA, et al. (2014). Olfactory exposure to males, including men, causes stress and related analgesia in rodents. Nature Methods, 11: 629–632. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2935 Bird RB, Bird DW. (2008). Why women hunt: Risk and contemporary foraging in a Western Desert Aboriginal community. Current Anthropology, 49: 655–693. DOI: 10.1086/587700 Haas R, Watson J, Buonasera T, et al. (2020). Female hunters of the early Americas. Science Advances, 6: eabd0310. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abd0310 Anderson A, Chilczuk S, Nelson K, Ruther R, Wall-Scheffler C. (2023). The myth of Man the Hunter: Women’s contribution to the hunt across ethnographic contexts. PLOS ONE, 18: e0287101. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287101 Amo L, López P, Martín J, et al. (2011). Smelling out predators is innate in birds. Ardea, 99: 177–184. DOI: 10.5253/078.099.0207 de Resende NC, Teixeira CP, de Azevedo CS. (2024). Flight initiation distance in an urban bird: Influence of the number of people, gaze orientation, and bird behavior. Birds, 5: 255–264. DOI: 10.3390/birds5020017 BGM That Girl (feat. Veegee) [Ye Remix] - Olly Murs