百老汇赔钱音乐剧Funny Girl女主被炒?吃瓜幕后空降推特热搜

不学无术 Naughty Ones

这期特快八卦播报节目,由北美娱乐圈专业吃瓜群众小远录制。 经典百老汇复排音乐剧Funny Girl「滑稽女郎」,一边赔钱一边使出浑身解数,依靠换女主风波冲到本周推特热搜榜一,成功翻红。原定女主演Beanie Feldstein惨淡收场提前跑路,且被凭借Glee大热的话题女星Lea Michele夺走女主之位。 好莱坞关系户Beanie,败给百老汇出身的Lea,这是必然还是偶然?北美的吃瓜群众们又作何反应?这场闹剧是否就此停歇?快来收听吧! 【时间轴】 0:37 音乐剧Funny Girl简要介绍 1:41 Funny Girl当前女主角Beanie Feldstein的履历,人际,与“关系户”争议 5:02 Lea Michele是谁?她与Funny Girl的渊源;她的人品争议/职场霸凌/种族主义指控 8:41 Lea和Beanie之间是否有矛盾?两人对彼此的看法如何? 9:40 Funny Girl正式开演!剧评人和观众对Beanie的评价如何?Funny Girl大滑铁卢?!幕后抓马悄悄开始。 13:51 Beanie提前落跑的真实原因为何?官方宣布新女主接手,谜团之中Lea Michele的身影开始浮现,命定大女主的回归?话题空间推特热搜第一! 【主播】:小远 @不学无术 Naughty Ones 【收听方式】 欢迎在苹果Podcast,小宇宙,喜马拉雅,Spotify,Google Podcasts等泛用性播客客户端订阅「不学无术 Naughty Ones」找到我们。 【网站】:https://naughtyones.podbean.com/

22分钟
58
3年前

误读:Don’t Give Up on XXX

不学无术 Naughty Ones

昨天到今天我被徐州丰县八孩女子最终调查通报相关的各类信息所淹没。 千头万绪,千言万语,最终决定用这样一种另类且安全的方式,记录下我此刻的心情,不为别人,只为自己。 希望每个普通人,哪怕身处黑暗,也能心向光明。 【文稿】 What does it mean to love your country? I have spent most of my life studying our country’s history and literature because of a deep if sometimes difficult affinity I would call love. Deeper, though, is a feeling like a love of family, a hope that whoever by whatever accident or choice falls under the definition of family will thrive and will experience even a difficult life as a blessing because his or her worth is a fact without conditions. A family would take practical steps to ease one another through hard times and to preserve the integrity of home as a special refuge. The honor of a family would consist in a very generous acknowledgment of claims on its loyalty and care. It is often said that country is an idea, stated definitively in early documents left to us by a coterie of men seemingly too compromised to have come up with such glorious language — as we would be, too, if we should happen to achieve anything comparable. Human beings are sacred, therefore equal. We are asked to see one another in the light of a singular inalienable worth that would make a family of us if we let it. The ethic in these words should be the standard by which we judge ourselves, our social arrangements, our dealings with the vast family of humankind. It will always find us wanting. The idea is a progressive force, constantly and necessarily exposing our failures and showing us new paths forward. For some time we have been dealing with an active rejection of this idea. As a woman who saw the world before the movements for civil rights and women’s rights, I know how potent the idea of equality can be. There are those who find it threatening, who are so fearful of dealing with other groups, or with women, on equal terms that they fantasize about violence toward them, treating whole categories of their own people as deadly enemies. They have translated anger and disappointment into rage against people of other opinions, the elites, the poor, even people whose very existence cannot be proved. As a liberal, I am loyal to this country in ways that make me a pragmatist. If someone is hungry, feed him. He will be thirsty, so be sure that he has good water to drink. If he is in prison, don’t abuse, abandon or exploit him, or assume that he ought to be there. If these problems afflict whole populations, those with influence or authority should repent and do better, as all the prophets tell them. At present we are told that this country is being made great, but specifics are hard to come by. This country was, from the outset, a tremendous leap of faith. We tend not to ponder the brutality of the European world at the time our colonies formed and then fledged, so we have little or no idea of the radicalism not only of stating that “men,” as creatures of God, were equal, but of giving the idea profound political consequences by asserting for them unalienable rights, which were defined and elaborated in the Constitution. Our history to the present day is proof that people find justice hard to reach and to sustain. It is also proof that where justice is defined as equality, a thing never to be assumed, justice enlarges its own definition, pushing its margins in light of a better understanding of what equality should mean. There is much to be done, more than inevitably limited people can see at a given moment. But the other side of our limitation is the fact that it carries with it a promise that we still might see a new birth of freedom, and another one beyond that. Social justice is the great instrument of human advancement. We have no right to fail it. ——Marilynne Robinson

7分钟
31
3年前

不愿追剧 |《开端》有多惊喜,结局就有多失望

不学无术 Naughty Ones

在《开端》大结局播出之后,已经激情追剧一周的我和李李老师当天立刻连麦录制了这期节目,聊聊我们对这部开年第一爆剧的感受。 「时间轴」 01:08 这部剧最初哪里吸引到了你?全剧追完的综合感受 06:11 西瓜大叔的人物刻画,全剧泪点;与《源代码》的相似之处 12:55 焦叔过于标准完美的普通话让底层百姓的形象失去了一些信服力 14:52 对最后两集大结局的感受:挖坑不填,从头到尾无数问号 30:29 45路乘客的人物结局:我们为什么不喜欢这个完美到失真的大团圆结局? 33:51 聊聊我们心中剧中演员的演技排名;关于“锅姨”刘丹超强演技的不同看法;司机黄觉的演技到底哪里不对? 39:46 赵今麦的表现能排第几?白敬亭被压戏?聊聊我们最爱的诗云二人CP时刻 48:59 准备药检的刘涛 vs 人见人爱的刘奕君;猫之使徒卢迪;暴躁深情江警官; 59:53 卢迪妈妈的泼妇+不可理喻的人物塑造为什么让我们这么不舒服?为什么剧中几乎每一个中老年妇女形象都充满了刻板印象? 「主播」 西西:很少看国产现代电视剧的理智路人观众 李李:悬疑推理爱好者;喜欢白敬亭的理智路人观众 【关于节目】 横跨中美,聊聊我们的生活和热爱。 微博 @不学无术 Naughty Ones 【收听方式】 欢迎在苹果Podcast,小宇宙,喜马拉雅,Spotify,Google Podcasts等泛用性播客客户端订阅「不学无术 Naughty Ones」找到我们。 【网站】:https://naughtyones.podbean.com/

89分钟
99+
3年前

不看电影 | Tick, Tick, Boom! 一位纽约音乐剧传奇剧作家的自白

不学无术 Naughty Ones

本期节目,我们来聊聊近期上映的一部音乐剧改编电影 Tick, Tick... Boom! 「倒数时刻」。 该片在美国本土剧院和Netflix 上映后好评如潮,获得包括金球奖最佳音乐喜剧电影、好莱坞影评人协会奖在内的多项提名。饰演男主Jon的知名影星“加菲”Andrew Garfield,在刚刚结束的第79届金球奖颁奖典礼上凭本片斩获金球奖音乐喜剧类最佳男主角,首次拿下金球影帝殊荣。 「Tick, Tick... Boom! 」改编自Jonathan Larson 乔纳森·拉森创作的同名半自传音乐剧,由知名作曲家“林漫威”Lin-Manuel Miranda 指导,讲述了音乐剧作曲家Jon在纽约一边穷困潦倒为生计奔波,一边雄心勃勃志在创作出一部能改变音乐剧时代的作品。随后大获成功的跨时代作品「RENT」(吉屋出租)正是由乔纳森·拉森创作。 「时间轴」 01:30「Tick, Tick... Boom! 」林漫威和加菲写给乔纳森·拉森以及所有音乐剧爱好者的的情书 10:30 聊一聊片中让你印象深刻的音乐片段;乔纳森·拉森惊人的创作才华与多变的音乐风格 32:04 乔纳森·拉森对林漫威的重大启蒙;Rent, Tick, Tick... Boom! 对In the Heights, Hamilton的影响 44:26 Theatre Kids专属:片中大量隐藏的「Rent」彩蛋 48:56 林漫威、乔纳森·拉森、斯蒂芬·桑德海姆三代剧作家之间动人的彼此照亮与惺惺相惜 56:41 音乐剧剧场版与电影版的不同;浅谈上海中文音乐剧版 1:08:32 2021年歌舞片/音乐剧电影扎堆,聊聊我们心中的佳作与烂片 【主创】 西西:美东戏剧行业工作者,乔纳森·拉森粉丝 【嘉宾】 小远:纽约广告人,电影/戏剧爱好者 慧慧:上海打工人,音乐剧爱好者 【关于节目】 横跨中美,聊聊我们的生活和热爱。 微博 @不学无术 Naughty Ones 【收听方式】 欢迎在苹果Podcast,小宇宙,喜马拉雅,Spotify,Google Podcasts等泛用性播客客户端订阅「不学无术 Naughty Ones」找到我们。 【网站】:https://naughtyones.podbean.com/

91分钟
99+
3年前

不看电影 | Dear Evan Hansen - 音乐剧改编电影为什么这么难成功?

不学无术 Naughty Ones

本期节目,我们来聊聊近期上映的一部音乐剧改编电影 < Dear Evan Hansen > 「致埃文汉森」。 这部电影改编自2015年同名百老汇音乐剧,讲述了一个有社交障碍/焦虑症的高中男孩,因为一场意外陷入谎言的漩涡,也同时因此拥有了一次前所未有的人生体验。音乐剧版本被媒体称为21世纪最动人的音乐剧作品,从票房到观众口碑都达到了现象级的成就。 然而这部众望所归,众星捧月的电影一经上映却遭遇了巨大的滑铁卢,不仅票房失利,口碑惨淡,从剧版回归的男主角Ben Platt (本·普拉特)本人也陷入了重重负面争议之中。 你会听到: 1、Ben Platt的年龄争议与个人言论;电影选角的成与败。 2、为什么优秀的音乐剧作品被影视化改编后总是失利? 3、如何看待被删减的歌曲和新添加的剧情?从剧场到大荧幕一定要“三观更正”吗? 4、细数你印象中最喜欢和最失望的几个歌曲片段 5、我们为什么会被这个故事文本打动? 个人最有共鸣的地方是哪里? 【主创】 西西:美东戏剧行业工作者,媒体人 【嘉宾】 小远:广告设计师,电影及音乐剧八卦爱好者 佳凝:新能源市场研究工作者,音乐剧爱好者 【关于节目】 横跨中美,聊聊我们的生活和热爱。 微博 @不学无术 Naughty Ones 【收听方式】 欢迎在苹果Podcast,小宇宙,喜马拉雅,Spotify,Google Podcasts等泛用性播客客户端订阅「不学无术 Naughty Ones」找到我们。 【网站】:https://naughtyones.podbean.com/

62分钟
99+
3年前
EarsOnMe

加入我们的 Discord

与播客爱好者一起交流

立即加入

扫描微信二维码

添加微信好友,获取更多播客资讯

微信二维码

播放列表

自动播放下一个

播放列表还是空的

去找些喜欢的节目添加进来吧